| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Phil Phil
#player2 Rebecca_Lambert Rebecca Lambert
>Phil: ABELNTZ 8D BLAZEN +40 40
#note I put down BLAZE and looked at my rack- NT. "Oh, why keep the N"
>Rebecca_Lambert: ACELS J4 LACES +31 31
#note Neither of us questioned BLAZENS. Sadly, I actually considered challenging because I thought BLAZEN might be an adjective. :( PATHETIC
>Phil: ALNOSTX K3 LOX +40 80
>Rebecca_Lambert: EPRV L4 PERV +38 69
>Phil: AIJMNST 9F NAM +24 104
#note Why play RAJ without keeping an A? JALOP 4H is nice, didn't see it.
>Rebecca_Lambert: HIRT D8 .IRTH +20 89
>Phil: AAIJSST 10B JA. +26 130
#note Maybe I should have added the S to prevent the A front hook; Q still likes JAR best.
>Rebecca_Lambert: EEILNOP M2 BYED +38 127
>Rebecca_Lambert: EEILNOP -- -38 89
>Phil: AEIMSST 11C E.ATISMS +72 202
#note Ugh. I saw MISSEAT, but doubted it and didn't play it. I didn't see MISEATS. I don't know TAMISES or SAMITES.
>Rebecca_Lambert: BEY M2 BYE +22 111
>Phil: IIOORUY 12I YOUR +23 225
>Rebecca_Lambert: ?DEELQU A7 EQUaLED +111 222
>Phil: DEIINOW B5 NIDI +21 246
#note I missed the sweet IODIN at N2.
>Rebecca_Lambert: CEFOR A1 FORCE +41 263
>Phil: AAEEFOW B1 AWE +29 275
>Rebecca_Lambert: EIIPU L10 EU.IPI +9 272
>Phil: AEFOORT 1L FARO +42 317
>Rebecca_Lambert: ADEGIST 13A .IT +8 280
>Phil: EGOOTVW 14J WO. +16 333
#note Basically I didn't want any chance for a 3x3. Losing by fewer than 120 guaranteed me third place, and a 3x3 could allow her to beat me by more than that.
>Rebecca_Lambert: GO 10L .GO +6 286
>Phil: EGGKOTV C3 VEG +30 363
#note TEGG C1 is sweet.
>Rebecca_Lambert: AADDIIN -AA +0 286
>Phil: ?DGKNOT 15K D.NGO +24 387
#note The K at 9C is nice
>Rebecca_Lambert: AH 14N AH +21 307
>Phil: ?IKOSTT 9C K. +23 410
>Rebecca_Lambert: DEINNTU B13 .N +4 311
>Phil: ?IORSTT 15A InTORTS +73 483
#note If you couldn't tell, I played this game pretty horribly, but my tiles (and her 4 consecutive <10 point plays) carried me through. I'm not pleased though.
>Phil: (ADEINTU) +16 499
|
