| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Dan_Wachtell Dan Wachtell
#player2 Josh Josh
>Dan_Wachtell: CENOVY 8G CONVEY +36 36
#note Crazy game against Wachtell on facebook Scrabble. I don't remember all of my racks, and I have some partial racks from Dan.
>Josh: AADEEEW J5 WEA.E +13 13
>Dan_Wachtell: ORS 8G ......ORS +51 87
>Josh: DEEX K5 EX +37 50
>Dan_Wachtell: INOV 4K VINO +27 114
>Josh: AADEL I5 ALA. +24 74
>Dan_Wachtell: AFHL 3L HALF +31 145
>Josh: CDEIMRU 10F MUCID +37 111
>Dan_Wachtell: ADQU 2J QUAD +44 189
>Josh: EIINRST O8 .INISTER +77 188
>Dan_Wachtell: EELPS H10 .LEPES +33 222
>Josh: ?GHIOPT 15A hIGHTOP. +101 289
>Dan_Wachtell: BBS N2 S..B +42 264
#note said he was missing an E for SLOBBER for 64!
>Josh: AEKLOTW 14F WO. +31 320
>Dan_Wachtell: ABIINNR C8 BRAININ. +74 338
>Josh: ?AEKLRT 12G R.TAcKLE. +74 394
#note I thought this was positionally favorable to TALKIER or RATLIKE on column D because bingos on the whole right side were no longer possible. I also thought that I wasn't giving him a shot back into the game sooner by omitting to play on the left. I noticed the J in the bag and also decided I didn't like TALKiER because it gave him a nicer spot for it, but the Z in the bag is also an issue. I think I may have overthought a bit here and I should have taken the extra points, but hey, disconnected nines. Unfortunately the better disconnected 9 was missed, TELEMARKS!
>Dan_Wachtell: FRUYZ D4 FURZY +59 397
#note Oy
>Josh: JO 7M JO +36 430
>Dan_Wachtell: AEMT E3 TAME +27 424
>Josh: ADEINTU 6H I... +11 441
#note I wanted to block all Dan's possible bingos here although I only saw GEODETI(C). But I also wanted to make sure I wasn't going to lose. I think leaving 2 in the bag ensures I have privileged access to the endgame and therefore I don't see a scenario where I lose, as there aren't really two spots where Dan can threaten an out with 4 letters if he plays the maximum of 5 letters next turn with something like GOODI(E) 14J. If I draw the G, he doesn't even have two outs with EERT! But if I draw the T, he indeed has two spots for EEGR, with GE(N)RE 12A and EGER F1. Therefore ILEX is a fallible play I perhaps shouldn't have made. Hmm! I guess I just need to play IN(BY) for 27 and win in every scenario he doesn't have a bingo, and even in some that he does, as I might be able to bingo back with OUTRA(G)ED after GEODETI(C) if the G remains in the bag.
>Dan_Wachtell: GO 8A GO.. +30 454
>Josh: ADEGNTU 14J DETUN. +22 463
#note I didn't even realize he gave me a bingo here, so this game was much closer than it needed to be. -50!!!
>Dan_Wachtell: DEEIORT 15J EDITO. +21 475
>Josh: AG 9L AG +23 486
>Josh: (ER) +4 490
|
