| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Thomas_Reinke Thomas Reinke
#player2 Matthew_Ridout Matthew Ridout
>Thomas_Reinke: EGIOQTU 8D QUOIT +48 48
>Matthew_Ridout: BEIMORV 9C VIM +27 27
>Thomas_Reinke: BDEEGKT 7G KEG +28 76
>Matthew_Ridout: ABDEORR 9H ARBORED +65 92
>Thomas_Reinke: BDEELTT 8K BEDEL +40 116
>Matthew_Ridout: AEFIPYZ 6H ZAP +36 128
#note instead of faze. because I'm a bad persuhn.
>Thomas_Reinke: AEFSTTY K3 FAYS +35 151
#note I knew this sucked when I played it, and guess what? It sucks. 10J YA scores almost as much though is also poor defensively. E7 TUMEFY looks good to me.
>Matthew_Ridout: EFHIIIY 10N HI +28 156
#note HELP! IFFY rated 11 pts higher. What's they key factor -leave? Maybe the fact that the HI dump isn't likely to get taken if I need it over the next couple turns?
>Thomas_Reinke: ERTTTWW 4I TW.T +14 165
#note J2 WET blocks the foolish OFAYS possiblity I opened up.
>Matthew_Ridout: EFIIIOY 10J YO +33 189
#note HELP! YO scores 11 more than (F)IEF, yet valuates at 11 pts less, nd despite my leave hanging onto a consonant. Is it opening up row 11 that makes mine so inferior?
>Thomas_Reinke: EEIORTW 11I WET +32 197
#note Keeps the O but we'll see how that works out later.
>Matthew_Ridout: AEFIIIN -AEIIIFN +0 189
#note This actually rates third best. (F)IEF once again best.
>Thomas_Reinke: AEGIOPR E8 ..PIRE +20 217
#note I think I had forgotten about the OFAYS possiblity by this point.
>Matthew_Ridout: ?AAOSUV 3G VAU +14 203
#note HELP! AVO at 2J rated best, where as Quackle called my play a stink bomb. I know I'm behind, but AVO just seems ripe for Thomas to hammer. Thoughts?
>Thomas_Reinke: ?AEEGNO 12D O.ANGE +23 240
#note 2I PEONAGE. Yup, forgot about the hook. Embarassingly bad play so far.
>Matthew_Ridout: ?AAIORS O1 rASORIA. +74 277
#note 2nd best to AbROSIA, 2H
>Thomas_Reinke: ?EEIIMT 1H TIMElIE. +74 314
#note Wasn't 100% on ITEMIZER.
>Matthew_Ridout: ADFNOSX N5 OX +52 329
#note HELP! Only 3 pts and 3% win difference, but why does Quackle indicate AX is better? Two O's unseen to me to one A. I assumed trying to stay duplicate-free was good idea.
>Thomas_Reinke: CCDHJNT M1 .CH +16 330
#note Fishing for O10 INJECT. Genius.
>Matthew_Ridout: ADFIINS 13B FIN. +16 345
#note FIND, 14B scores adozen more but vauation advantage only haf that. Still, another gaffe.
>Thomas_Reinke: CDEJNOT O10 .NJECT +69 399
#note Thomas' annotation notes indicate he fished for this. To my surprise, Quackle never indicates I should've blocked this possibility.
>Matthew_Ridout: ADGILRS 13M AG. +8 353
#note I thought this worked for being a tremendous bingo lane-opener and fish. Quackle rated it as a dumpster fire, preferring LAD at 14A by -41- valuation pts. and dpouble the % chance to win.
>Thomas_Reinke: ADEOOSU 13H ODA +18 417
#note There are a few bingos he could still have to the T.
>Matthew_Ridout: DEILRRS B13 .IR +12 365
#note HELP! It's on the board, butQuackle indicates LAR at M4 gives me a surprising 40% chance to win, MUCH higher than anything else. How is it so high when is a 70% chance that opp has the other S?
>Thomas_Reinke: ELLNOSU 14A L.NES +21 438
#note No more bingo possiblities.
>Matthew_Ridout: DELNRSU 14J DURN +18 383
>Thomas_Reinke: LNOU H12 ..ON +15 453
>Matthew_Ridout: ELS H6 ....S +14 397
>Thomas_Reinke: LU 10E .UL. +8 461
>Thomas_Reinke: (EL) +4 465 |
