| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Noah Noah
#player2 Nigel Nigel
>Noah: IIOOPUW -IIOOUW +0 0
#note Exchange all might be better.
>Nigel: EFGIOQR 8G QI +22 22
#note Nigel provided his racks for this game.
>Noah: ABEIJPT 9F BITE +22 22
#note I thought that out of BEJ, AJP, AEJP, and ABEJ, AJP would have the best synergy. Quackle suggests that this is not true.
>Nigel: AEFGORT J3 FAGOTER +70 92
>Noah: AIJNOPR 4H PR.JNA +36 58
#note An interesting play. I realized that JAPING and JINGO were quite a bit better equity-wise, but with an early deficit, I liked the way this forked the board.
>Nigel: ADEEGNO 5J .OAD +35 127
>Noah: DEFIIOU 3M FOU +26 84
>Nigel: EEGNNRT 6L NEG +19 146
>Noah: CDEIIRV H1 CRI.E +27 111
#note Was tempted to try VITRICIDE* here. I like the way this forks the board, but the leave is so bad that CIVIE 10B, which I didn't see, has to be better.
>Nigel: ?EINRTU 1A NEURoTI. +80 226
>Noah: AADIIOV -ADIIOVA +0 111
>Nigel: IKLLOUZ 7H LU.Z +17 243
#note Missing a big play -- O1 ZOUK.
>Noah: EGINNPW 10B GWINE +21 132
>Nigel: ?EEIKLO A1 .OsELIKE +86 329
>Noah: ABNPTTV - +0 132
#note I was about 90% sure NOsELIKE was a word. However, it really puts my position in the toilet, and my calculations suggested that challenging was correct.
>Nigel: EHHOSVY O6 SHOVE +38 367
>Noah: ABNPTTV -BPTV +0 132
>Nigel: CEHILMY N10 HEMIC +53 420
>Noah: AADNSTY O1 YA.D +30 162
>Nigel: ILTUVWY 12L VU. +16 436
>Noah: AABMNST N1 AB. +23 185
>Nigel: AILRTWY D7 WAR.LY +26 462
>Noah: AILMNST B1 .M +16 201
>Nigel: ADIOOTX K10 OXO +29 491
>Noah: AEILNST B8 TA.LINES +70 271
>Nigel: ADINPST 15B .ANDPITS +86 577
>Nigel: (ADEORST) +16 593
|
