| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Matthew_Tunnicliffe Matthew Tunnicliffe
#player2 Jeremy_Hildebrand Jeremy Hildebrand
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: BELOQSS -BOQ +0 0
#note Interesting sim results. Ex Q is tops? I find that strange because BLSSEO doesn't make many sevens. I guess it makes lots of eights, but I wouldn't count of getting many letters to play through after exchanging 1. And then Ex. QS and Ex. QB are next. I hate exchanging esses. It was really between ELSS and ELOSS, and I didn't like the O. Shrug. The exchanges are all very close, obviously.
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: EGGIU 8D GIGUE +18 18
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AEILOSS D3 SOILA.ES +68 68
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: DEO C9 DOE +13 31
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EKLNTTY B10 KNELT +57 125
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: AEILSTT 3D .ALTIEST +60 91
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ?EJMOTY 6B JO.TY +39 164
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: AEW A11 AWE +24 115
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ?AAEMNW K1 WA.ErMAN +74 238
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: CFO H1 CO.F +39 154
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ABFGIRU 8J U.FAIR +39 277
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: DQU N6 QU.D +34 188
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: BEGRSTX 4C B.X +21 298
#note I spent a lot of time debating this/GOX or BERGS. I liked the bingo blocking of BERGS, but didn't like opening the 2x2. I can survive a weak bingo, but not a 120-pointer. I am happy with my choice. Although GOX is apparently better. I knew it!
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: IOY F1 OI.Y +25 213
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DEGNRST 10I TRENDS +28 326
#note I struggled here. This is the kind of rack that is begging for a fish. But I just kept telling myself that fishing is the best way to lose here. Fish and miss fish and miss, he bingos and the game is close again. I wanted to pressure, even if it wasn't the right rack for this. TRENDS kills a lot of lines, which I like. But it is the wrong play, I think, because it leaves the -IER 2x2 open. Like I said last turn, I am not going to lose to a dinky bingo on the existing lines. I am going to lose to a huge bingo on this new line. So I dunno. I still like playing here over gishing. But maybe a different word? Not sure. This must be a mistake though.
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: BO 7B OB. +24 237
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: BO -- -24 213
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EEGHLVZ 1K .HEEL +45 371
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: BU M10 .UB +6 219
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EGHNRVZ 12J VER. +18 389
#note Idiot! It wasn't until after the game that I realized this didn't actually block the -IER 2x2! Oh well. Even something like CuPPIER isn't going to beat me at this point.
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: ?CEINOR G8 .NEROtIC +60 279
#note CORNIER!
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DGHNOVZ 14D DOZ.NG +37 426
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: P 2E P. +16 295
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AAHIMRV 4J H.RMAI +29 455
#note Did I really miss F10 HAM? This is a bad play.
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: AOP 3M APO +24 319
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ATV 11E VA. +12 467
>Jeremy_Hildebrand: IINR B6 .IN +10 329
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: T F11 .T +4 471
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: (IR) +4 475
|
