| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Tunnicliffe Tunnicliffe
#player2 Kang_Rau Kang Rau
>Tunnicliffe: BEILOPS 8G BOP +14 14
>Kang_Rau: EHORW 9E WHORE +25 25
>Tunnicliffe: AAEILNS 8A LIANA +23 37
#note So my first instinct was HA. But then I saw that my leave whiffs drawing AEI and decided to just blow it up. I was right to pass up HA, I believe, but Quackle is suggesting other plays. 7G ANA and 7E LIANA sim well. Also 10F AA. I dunno, I am thinking these sim results have a lot to do with the inflated oppo bingo % after LIANA. But Quackle isn't accounting for oppo just drawing 5 new tiles. So I would overlook that number. I like LIANA, it is by no means the obvious play.
>Kang_Rau: DUW 10I WUD +17 42
>Tunnicliffe: EERSSTT 11G TESTERS +81 118
>Kang_Rau: ?EGIMNS C7 M.NGIESt +78 120
>Tunnicliffe: ABIJNOT M5 BANJOI.T +69 187
#note Opening up three huge scoring lanes at once!
>Kang_Rau: EEFRV N2 FEVER +34 154
>Tunnicliffe: ADEKLRY O5 YELK +44 231
>Kang_Rau: HOO L4 OOH +28 182
>Tunnicliffe: ADEFIRT N9 IF +28 259
#note Hmm, I had considered M2 IF! But it seemed so unnecessarily risky! In hindsight, it's totally worth it. I failed to consider that I'm blocking easy 40-point plays from O1.
>Kang_Rau: NU 7C .UN +13 195
>Tunnicliffe: ADDERTU O1 DAD +23 282
#note Might have seen U(NAW)ARDED if I'd looked harder.
>Kang_Rau: ACIR H11 .RICA +24 219
>Tunnicliffe: EEGPRTU 3I ERUPT.. +31 313
>Kang_Rau: GMU 6E GUM +16 235
>Tunnicliffe: CDEGOYZ 14H .OZY +38 351
>Kang_Rau: III -III +0 235
>Tunnicliffe: CDEGORX 15K ERGOD +29 380
>Tunnicliffe: CDEGORX -- -29 351
#note 1) 2G CODEX is so obvious; and 2) ERGODIC + ERGOT = ERGOD* in my head.
>Kang_Rau: AAV 15K AVA +15 250
>Tunnicliffe: CDEGORX 2I DEX +29 380
#note CODEX is still obvious.
>Kang_Rau: ?EEILTT 4C rETITLE +68 318
>Tunnicliffe: CGLNOOR 10A CO.ON +19 399
>Kang_Rau: AAEIIQS 3F QI +26 344
>Tunnicliffe: GILNR 14M LIN +8 407
>Kang_Rau: AAEIS 7I SAE +15 359
>Tunnicliffe: GR 12B R.G +8 415
#note RIG
>Tunnicliffe: (AI) +4 419
|
