| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Craig_Rowland Craig Rowland
#player2 Matthew_Tunnicliffe Matthew Tunnicliffe
>Craig_Rowland: EIVWY 8H VIEWY +36 36
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ENORTTY K6 TO.ERY +24 24
>Craig_Rowland: LNO I7 L.ON +6 42
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EPRSTTX L7 P.X +28 52
>Craig_Rowland: AOR J4 ORA +9 51
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: EHNOSTT 3G SHOTTEN +78 130
>Craig_Rowland: ADKN 4L DANK +36 87
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AAADGOU H1 AG.A +27 157
>Craig_Rowland: EMR O1 MER. +30 117
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AABDOSU J10 OBA +19 176
>Craig_Rowland: BO I12 BO +9 126
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ADEOSUW H12 OWED +38 214
>Craig_Rowland: AAEGIRT 15E GRA.IATE +61 187
#note Brutal. It looked fishy to me, but I thought I was just being unsure of my high-prob stuff again. I didn't even hold.
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: AFIILSU 14J FA +28 242
#note Sim says 11D FUSIL.
>Craig_Rowland: EF N1 EF +24 211
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CIIILSU -IILU +0 242
#note I was blind to the PYXIS/PYXIE spot. Also, CILIA is better than trading.
>Craig_Rowland: ?DENRSV 5B VENDeRS +79 290
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CIIRSUZ 2F ZI. +35 277
>Craig_Rowland: EJOT D1 JETO. +40 330
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CHILRSU 11D CHURL +29 306
#note I absolutely hated this play for obvious reasons. But the alternatives were so crappy. I dunno. Quackle likes the play, but it doesn't realise how defensively any opponent will play in response.
>Craig_Rowland: INU D9 UN.I +12 342
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ?EIIMNS B1 MINI.ErS +78 384
#note Couldn't have asked for a luckier break. And no, Quackle, I am not doing PYXIES instead.
>Craig_Rowland: AEGLT A8 AGLET +27 369
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CDEIPSU A1 UP +28 412
>Craig_Rowland: IILQU C12 QI +33 402
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CDEIS 14A CIS +22 434
#note Kind of embarrassing that I intended to play out with CEDIS, but then decided I wasn't 10000% sure of it. PYXIES is still better. Spread flush!
>Craig_Rowland: ILU L1 LI.. +6 408
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DE 6E ED +16 450
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: (U) +2 452
|
