| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Edward_Okulicz Edward Okulicz
#player2 Andrew_Fisher Andrew Fisher
>Edward_Okulicz: ACEILOT 8F ALOETIC +74 74
>Andrew_Fisher: ACEHIJY 7F JAY +31 31
>Edward_Okulicz: DDGMNU K4 MUDD.NG +24 98
>Edward_Okulicz: EMPY (challenge) +5 103
>Andrew_Fisher: CEGHITU L2 CHUG +31 62
#note HUGE L1 is, on reflection, rather better
>Edward_Okulicz: EMPY J1 YMPE +22 125
>Andrew_Fisher: DEINRST I5 INS.RTED +76 138
>Edward_Okulicz: AAEFN H11 FAENA +36 161
>Andrew_Fisher: AEIRUWX H1 WUXIA +50 188
#note Tempted by REWAX, but WUXIA sims better
>Edward_Okulicz: BERV 9D VERB +30 191
>Andrew_Fisher: EENORRV 15B OVERNE.R +62 250
>Edward_Okulicz: ITZ J12 ZIT +27 218
>Andrew_Fisher: AEHIIKO 10E AKE +50 300
>Edward_Okulicz: ILNOS 11B LOINS +32 250
#note LOINS here is much preferable to LIONS, generating hook openings on either side
>Andrew_Fisher: AEEHIIO L10 OHIA +17 317
#note Yes, well OHIA/ALOINS seems to work out better. Quackle also suggests the overbold MOCHIE 2J
>Edward_Okulicz: ?AADORT 13A mATADOR. +68 318
#note MATADOR A8 scores a few more
>Andrew_Fisher: EEFILTU A6 FUTILE +33 350
>Edward_Okulicz: PTW M12 TWP +28 346
>Andrew_Fisher: ?BEEIOR 14A OB +19 369
#note Decided to forgo EBRIOSE here, on the basis that if the Q was in the bag (at least 30%) Edward probably had a snapback bingo. Quackle's CP thinks HOE 3L a little better than OB...I'm not so sure, as Edward can easily clog up columns N/O
>Edward_Okulicz: EGINQSS N10 QIS +35 381
#note Not sure what Edward's exact rack was here (seven from EGILNQSS)
>Andrew_Fisher: ?EEIOOR 3C ORIfE. +26 395
#note My choice is slightly flashier, but Quackle reckons OE G2 garners a few more spread points. ORIFEX offers a losing outplay for Edward (LONGES C2)
>Edward_Okulicz: EGLNS 11K S. +36 417
>Edward_Okulicz: EGLNS -- -36 381
#note Reasonable try to salvage the game, but it's no good
>Andrew_Fisher: EO 3L .OE +12 407
>Andrew_Fisher: (EGLNS) +12 419
|
