| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Kevin_Leeds Kevin Leeds
#player2 David_Whitley David Whitley
>Kevin_Leeds: ?CDERWW -WW +0 0
>David_Whitley: AEGILRU -U +0 0
>Kevin_Leeds: ?CDELRV -V +0 0
>David_Whitley: AAEGILR 8B REGALIA +70 70
#note David wins this one - He shared with me his stem 'I glare' and an anamonic for it as recompense. Fish for what you know, he recommended me!
>Kevin_Leeds: ?CDEGLR C2 CuDGEL.R +76 76
>David_Whitley: BMOU 5C .UMBO +20 90
>Kevin_Leeds: EFSUZ H1 FUZES +65 141
>David_Whitley: EELNRUV 9G NERVULE +68 158
>Kevin_Leeds: AJ B8 .AJ +28 169
>David_Whitley: AI 6E AI +14 172
>Kevin_Leeds: ACEEITY K8 C.TEY +20 189
#note I knew this was not a very smart choice but I had trouble finding what looked decent. A great play is CE(C)ITY, blindness - ironically or not, I missed it! I got stuck trying to find something reasonable and took a vowel heavy leave, AEI
>David_Whitley: AFINOSS G7 S..FONIAS +64 236
>Kevin_Leeds: AAEEIIM F13 AMI +25 214
>David_Whitley: KOPY 2A PO.KY +32 268
>Kevin_Leeds: AEIIOTT L9 .ITAI +24 238
>David_Whitley: Q 15E Q.. +12 280
#note Good timing as I was about to score there with EX(IS)T
>Kevin_Leeds: EEOTTTX 1F TO.T +7 245
>David_Whitley: GSUV N6 VUGS +27 307
>Kevin_Leeds: EEENRTX D8 .ENET +15 260
#note Quackle says (G)ERENT is even better (word didn't come to mind). But even better than those is 12B EXTER(N)E forming R(AMI) for 36. I was glad I found this one. Just simply J12 REX looks a tiny bit better than (G)ENET to Quackle. I only seem to have 10-15% chance of winning (it's a guesstimate / approximation, not very exact but supported by some statistical analysis.)
>David_Whitley: DOR E11 DOR +19 326
>Kevin_Leeds: AENPRWX A1 A.EX +63 323
#note This is the one I was fishing for! the A!
>David_Whitley: DENR H11 REND +21 347
>Kevin_Leeds: HNPRTWW 4G H.WN +15 338
#note Found the right spot and idea but used the wrong tiles -W(E)PT leaves me with better synergy
>David_Whitley: ?BO 3F BO.o +26 373
#note I don't know David's rack. What could he be keeping to burn the blank now? If he was very short on vowels he wouldn't burn them both.
>Kevin_Leeds: EIOPRTW J11 WRITE +22 360
#note It seems possible that I have a small chance to win, depending on what David has vs. what is in the bag, if I play TO by VUGS for 17, or PEW and PYA for 24, or ROW for 20 (Quackle says. I don't claim to understand it.) That is really hard to see I think, so I don't feel too bad about this choice. The board is remarkably closed up I think.
>David_Whitley: HIN 7G .HIN +14 387
>Kevin_Leeds: AOOP 8M A.O +14 374
#note Could have played APO one row lower for 1 more point and avoided providing an out play
>David_Whitley: DEIL 6I LIED +13 400
>David_Whitley: (OP) +8 408
|
