| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Timothy_Bottorf Timothy Bottorf
#player2 Gunther_Jacobi Gunther Jacobi
>Timothy_Bottorf: ADHNY 8D HANDY +32 32
>Gunther_Jacobi: AEFSWXZ 9C ZAX +43 43
>Timothy_Bottorf: ADIQ G6 QA.I +16 48
>Gunther_Jacobi: EFIRSTW 10G SWIFTER +86 129
>Timothy_Bottorf: EITW M9 W.ITE +24 72
>Gunther_Jacobi: ?EGJLRU 14G JUgGLER +77 206
>Timothy_Bottorf: IKNO 15E IKON +39 111
>Gunther_Jacobi: ACEIMST 10B CAME +43 249
>Timothy_Bottorf: DF E7 F...D +32 143
>Gunther_Jacobi: EIIOSTU 9J OI +9 258
#note (Q)UOIT without a doubt. I botch games with plays like OI often. Sinking in to a blind-guessing-game-fish-mentality. OI is pretty brainless.
>Timothy_Bottorf: ELNO D12 LONE +20 163
>Gunther_Jacobi: EGIMSTU L10 .MU +18 276
#note ITS M12 40. Never thunk it.
>Timothy_Bottorf: AIR H4 RAI +15 178
>Gunther_Jacobi: AEGISTT 13C G.AT +10 286
#note WOW, missing the 'hard-to-find', (A)GITATES. DEATH.
>Timothy_Bottorf: ABDS N11 BADS +57 235
#note Closing in as expected! Sub-par plays deserve such results.
>Gunther_Jacobi: EEEIPST H10 .EE +7 293
#note Double death. I saw EPEEIST, but didn't see the wicked fit from I1. I really deserve a loss here. Squander it all...
>Timothy_Bottorf: ELOSV O7 LOVES +32 267
#note VOLES has better defensive merit, although I could still use H4.
>Gunther_Jacobi: AEIPSTV N2 SPAVIET +82 375
>Timothy_Bottorf: OUY M1 YOU +22 289
>Gunther_Jacobi: DHILOOT 15J OOH +24 399
#note Didn't know DHOOL(Y) 42.
>Timothy_Bottorf: AENPR 1H NAPER. +36 325
>Gunther_Jacobi: BCEGIRT 6M B.G +16 415
#note I like this play, yet maybe BR(I)G in the same spot is better, leaving one in the bag instead of two.
>Timothy_Bottorf: ?EEIORT 2B cOTERIE +68 393
>Gunther_Jacobi: CDILNRT C1 C.RD +14 429
#note Ooh, 4J CITR(A)L is the move.
>Timothy_Bottorf: NU 4C .UN +8 401
>Timothy_Bottorf: (ILNT) +8 409
|
