| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Scott_Appel Scott Appel
#player2 Matt_Canik Matt Canik
>Scott_Appel: EFH 8G FEH +18 18
>Matt_Canik: AEIIKSU G6 KU.I +13 13
#note KUFI actually wins the sim, despite not being the top static choice. Cool!
>Scott_Appel: CEP 6D PEC. +18 36
>Matt_Canik: AAEEILS 9I AE +9 22
>Scott_Appel: GINOT D4 TO.ING +20 56
>Matt_Canik: AAEILSV 4A AES.IVAL +63 85
>Scott_Appel: EPWY B2 WE.PY +42 98
>Matt_Canik: BDMOOQU A6 BOOM +31 116
>Scott_Appel: DOU 10J DUO +15 113
>Matt_Canik: DDQRUWZ E3 W.R.D +25 141
#note When I saw this rack, I got really enamored by the potential to either hit ZA 3G or QI C7, then I tried to find plays that allowed me to do either.... I just don't know why I missed QU(I)R(E)D
>Scott_Appel: EILOSTT 11D LITOTES +68 181
>Matt_Canik: DILOQUZ H1 QUI.L +42 183
#note QUILL is actually simming above QUOLL, probably because QUILL allows more Z plays at 3G next turn.
>Scott_Appel: CDLUY L8 CL.UDY +30 211
>Matt_Canik: ADGMOTZ 3G Z.G +46 229
#note Maybe that's why QUILL was higher.
>Scott_Appel: AJR B8 RAJ +32 243
>Matt_Canik: ADMOORT M11 MOO +27 256
#note Quackle wants me to play MOOD instead. I don't know if I want to upen that line with two esses and two blanks out.
>Scott_Appel: EFHI H11 .HIEF +45 288
>Matt_Canik: ADENNRT A1 NAN. +19 275
#note With a lot of Es and a lot of Ns in the bag, NANA just seems to make more sense than NADA. Quackle disagrees.
>Scott_Appel: AG C2 AG. +22 310
>Matt_Canik: ADEEORT 15H .OREDATE +92 367
>Scott_Appel: EINRRST 14B TERRIN.S +72 382
>Matt_Canik: AEINRTX 15A NIXE +50 417
#note This is bad. His bingo didn't have a blank in it, and I didn't draw one after mine. I *could* fish off the X. But if that happens, his bingo will outscore mine (assuming I pull one at all) and I'll lose. NIXE is mostly to save spread, and if he doesnt have a bingo I think he always loses after this. I suppose if I play EX C14, I can play NIXE AFTER he bingos and pick up some more spread.
>Scott_Appel: ??ABINS J1 aBStAIN +79 461
#note BRAINIS(H)
>Scott_Appel: (AERTV) +16 477
|
