| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Jacob_Williams Jacob Williams
#player2 Chris_Canik Chris Canik
>Jacob_Williams: HTY 8G THY +18 18
>Chris_Canik: EIKNOUX I6 ON.X +23 23
#note Ugh. Mistake. KUE 7F or just (Y)UK are better.
>Jacob_Williams: WW 6H W.W +17 35
>Chris_Canik: DEIKSTU K4 DUSK +28 51
#note Ughhhhh. UKE at J9 is better. This is next, but it's close between a lot of piddly options.
>Jacob_Williams: EGOUV 7C VOGUE +17 52
>Chris_Canik: ?ABEEIT 4H BEA.IEsT +78 129
#note E(V)ITABlE might be better.
>Jacob_Williams: INP O1 PIN. +18 70
>Chris_Canik: AEENORS L7 ARENOSE +72 201
#note Baby bingoes... I feel bad playing them.
>Jacob_Williams: BDNO K11 BOND +26 96
>Chris_Canik: EFGHMRS 15H FRESH +53 254
#note Luck.
>Jacob_Williams: ILR M2 LI.R +8 104
>Chris_Canik: ?AEGLMU 6D GAM +28 282
#note I don't know MOULAGE, but missing pLUMAGE and also (O)UtGLEAM is rather inexcusable.
>Jacob_Williams: ITZ 8L .ITZ +39 143
>Chris_Canik: ?AAEELU 5D ALAE +25 307
>Jacob_Williams: AILNRST 1G RATLINS +79 222
>Chris_Canik: ?ACEINU 14B tUNICAE +83 390
>Jacob_Williams: JU N6 JU. +26 248
>Chris_Canik: DEEIOOQ 15A QI +34 424
>Jacob_Williams: EIPRV 2D VIPER +20 268
>Chris_Canik: DEEOOOR O8 .EROED +17 441
#note This saves my rack quite nicely, and I'm actually more worried about this lane than the (ET)A 9A lane.
>Jacob_Williams: AFG J10 FAG +24 292
#note He assured me that this wasn't a stab at me for the tiles I'd ben drawing.
>Chris_Canik: ADEIOOT N11 TOEA +15 456
#note Quackle's endgame simulation is strange. It didn't even generate TOEA, but after inputting it, it's the second-best endgame play (O(V)OID at C6 wins by one more, apparently).
>Jacob_Williams: CLMOTY E10 MYOT.C +26 318
>Chris_Canik: DIO C7 .OID +9 465
#note ODI(C) or IDO(L) at F11 or 2J, respectively, are plays I should've seen.
>Chris_Canik: (L) +2 467
|
