| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Bradley_Whitmarsh Bradley Whitmarsh
#player2 Matthew_Tunnicliffe Matthew Tunnicliffe
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: ?AEEINT H7 lINEATE +64 64
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ABEIILV 9G I.VIABLE +69 69
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ADEHOWY (challenge) +5 74
#note Duh, VITIABLE. Didn't think to look for a better bingo with this rack.
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: APW G11 PAW +27 91
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ADEHOWY I11 WEY +37 111
#note Looked for a good overlap on top of INVIABLE, but didn't know HOAED#. This is fine though.
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: Q 8G Q. +22 113
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ADHNOSU 14F HAD +32 143
#note Two # bingos here: HOUDANS# and SEAHOUND#. Maybe I should have spent more time on bingos? This is a crappy play anyways. 10M OH is the best non-# play.
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: ?EEIKMO M5 dOME.IKE +66 179
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: JLNOOSU 8K JO. +25 168
#note Didn't know JOKOL#. This is close, though.
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: ACERSTU 15A CURATES +95 274
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: GLNORSU K8 ..RGON +28 196
#note JARUL#. Didn't get too far in the power-tile fives, either, lol.
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: AX N5 AX +51 325
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DGLSTUZ L12 LUTZ +54 250
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: AEMY 15K A.YME +57 382
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: ADEIINT (challenge) +5 387
#note Case in point. I was actually pretty sure this was good, but the game was over if it was.
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: DGIIOOS O5 GOOD +31 281
#note N5 AXISED is clever.
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: ADEIINT C8 DAINTIE. +70 457
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: CIINSTV 8A VI. +21 302
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: OSU N12 SOU. +16 473
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: ACGINST D2 ACTINGS +81 383
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: EELORSU 2D .UREOLES +62 535
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: BDELORT 5B TR.LOBED +72 455
>Bradley_Whitmarsh: FHINNRR B2 FIR.H +38 573
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: FP H1 F.P +24 479
#note This game was good for high win and high loss.
>Matthew_Tunnicliffe: (RNN) +6 485
|
